Meincke v. Oakland Garage, Inc.
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
After the decision of this case by the District Court of Appeal a petition for hearing was granted by this court for the purpose of giving further consideration to the legal position of a person who is injured while violating'a city ordinance prohibiting “jay walking”, we now adopt the opinion written by Mr. Justice pro tempore Dooling as the opinion of this court:
“This is an appeal from a judgment for plaintiff entered pursuant to the verdict of a jury. Shortly after 1 o’clock in the morning plaintiff was walking across East Twelfth Street in the city of Oakland near the middle of…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Girdner v. Union Oil Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Center v. Yellow Cab Co.California Supreme Court · 1932
- Sawyer v. Southern California Gas Co.California Supreme Court · 1929
- Rauch v. Southern California Gas Co.California Court of Appeal · 1929
- Hopkins v. Galland Mercantile Laundry Co.California Supreme Court · 1933
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Ketchum v. PatteeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Quinn v. RosenfeldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1940
- Genola v. BarnettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Leap v. ROYCEOregon Supreme Court · 1955
- Wooldridge v. MountsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1962
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.