Legal Opinion

Carrier Corp. v. Piper

District Court, W.D. Tennessee

Decided September 30, 2006No. 05-2307 Ml/VPublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANT QUANEX’S MOTION TO DISMISS; ORDER DENYING IN PART AND GRANTING IN PART PIPER DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS; AND ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT LUND’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

McCALLA, District Judge.

Before the Court is Defendant Quanex Corporation’s (“Quanex”) Motion to Dismiss Amended Complaint, filed September 13, 2005. Plaintiff Carrier Corporation (“Plaintiff’ or “Carrier”) responded on October 13, 2005, and Quanex filed reply briefs on September 20, 2005, and November 8, 2005. Also before the Court is the Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff…

2Cases cited64 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
  5. Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

59 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2014
  2. Differential Development-1994, Ltd. v. Harkrider Distributing Co.District Court, S.D. Texas · 2007
  3. American Premier Underwriters Inc. v. General Electric Co.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012
  4. PCS Nitrogen, Inc. v. Ross Development Corp.District Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
  5. Hobart Corp. v. Waste Management of Ohio, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2011

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API