Differential Development-1994, Ltd. v. Harkrider Distributing Co.
District Court, S.D. Texas
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND OPINION
ROSENTHAL, District Judge.
Among the questions presented by the motions to dismiss in this case is the question the Supreme Court left unresolved in Cooper Industries, Inc. v. Aviall Services, Inc., 543 U.S. 157, 125 S.Ct. 577, 160 L.Ed.2d 548 (2004): whether a party potentially responsible for the cleanup of property contaminated by hazardous substances under the Comprehensive Environmental Response, Compensation, and Liability Act (CERCLA), but not able to bring an action for contribution under section 113(f) of that statute, may bring a cost recovery or contribution…
2Cases cited90 opinions
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Swierkiewicz v. Sorema N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 2002
- Lawrence H. Ramming v. United States of America, John Thomas Cloud v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Trinity Industries, Inc. v. Chicago Bridge & Iron Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2013
- Asarco LLC v. Atlantic Richfield Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- United States Ex Rel. Foster v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Co.District Court, E.D. Texas · 2008
- Coppola v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2013
- Exxon Mobil Corp. v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.