Nite Moves Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Boise
District Court, D. Idaho
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER
WINMILL, Chief Judge.
Introduction
The Court finds that Boise’s nudity ordinance violates the First Amendment. By banning anything more revealing than short shorts and modest halter tops, the ordinance sweeps too broadly in curtailing expressive nude dancing, protected by the First Amendment under Supreme Court case law. The Court therefore finds the ordinance void and unenforceable. The Court’s analysis is set forth below.
Analysis
This action was initiated by the plaintiffs’ filing of a complaint seeking declaratory judgment and injunctive relief. Plaintiffs claim…
2Cases cited33 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Ward v. Rock Against RacismSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Ashwander v. Tennessee Valley AuthoritySupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Fantasyland Video, Inc. v. County of San DiegoDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2005
- Doctor John's v. WahlenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008