Legal Opinion
Doctor John's v. Wahlen
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 16, 2008No. 07-4131PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAUL KELLY, JR., Circuit Judge.
Plaintiff-Appellant Doctor John’s, Inc. appeals the grant of summary judgment in favor of the Defendant-Appellee City of Roy (“City”) on its claim that the City’s ordinance regulating sexually oriented businesses violates the First Amendment. The district court previously granted summary judgment to the City on all grounds, but we remanded for the district court to clarify what evidence it considered under the burden-shifting scheme of City of Los Angeles v. Alameda Books, Inc., 535 U.S. 425, 122 S.Ct. 1728, 152 L.Ed.2d 670 (2002) (plurality). See Doctor John’s,…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- City of Renton v. Playtime Theatres, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- City of Erie v. Pap's A. M.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Nixon v. Shrink Missouri Government PACSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Sun River Energy, Inc. v. NelsonCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2015
- Neiberger v. FED EX GROUND PACKAGE SYSTEM, INC.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2009
- Entertainment Productions, Inc. v. Shelby CountyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- 84 Video/newsstand, Inc. v. Thomas SartiniCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2011
- Cricket Store 17, LLC v. City of ColumbiaDistrict Court, D. South Carolina · 2015
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.