Legal Opinion
Fantasyland Video, Inc. v. County of San Diego
District Court, S.D. California
Decided June 14, 2005No. CIV. 02CV1909-LABRBB, CIV. 02CV2023-LABRBBPublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART PLAINTIFFS’ JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT; ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT; INJUNCTION; and ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE
BURNS, District Judge.
In their respective complaints, plaintiffs allege certain amendments to San Diego County ordinances regulating adult entertainment businesses violate their rights under the federal and California constitutions. Before the Court are plaintiffs’ Joint Motion for Summary Judgment and defendant’s Motion for Summary…
2Cases cited74 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Graham v. ConnorSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Albright v. OliverSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
69 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Fantasyland Video, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Tollis, Inc. v. County of San DiegoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Commonwealth v. JamesonKentucky Supreme Court · 2006
- Doctor John's v. WahlenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2008
- City of Seattle v. DavisCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2012
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.