Legal Opinion
Martha Griffith v. State of Colorado, Division of Youth Services
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided February 28, 1994No. 93-1005PublishedCited by 62 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge.
This Title VII, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e, et seq., case is before us on appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of the defendant, State of Colorado, Division of Youth Services (DYS). The plaintiff-appellant, Martha Griffith, hereinafter referred to as Griffith or plaintiff, claimed that she was subjected to actionable racial and sexual discrimination and harassment and retaliatory actions while employed by DYS. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291.
The Pleadings
In her complaint, Griffith alleged that she, as a five year white…
2Cases cited35 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Meritor Savings Bank, FSB v. VinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Albemarle Paper Co. v. MoodySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by62 opinions
- Tommy Hopkins v. John SaundersCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- James L. Bolden, Jr. v. Prc Inc., Formerly Known as Planning Research Corporation, and Robert CarverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1995
- Tayler Bayer v. Neiman Marcus Group, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
- Roe v. Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- United States v. MarolfCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
57 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.