Legal Opinion
Roe v. Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided September 2, 1997No. 96-1086PublishedCited by 126 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge.
I
Plaintiff-appellant Jane Roe (a pseudonym used for purposes of privacy) is an accounts manager for the defendant-appellee Cheyenne Mountain Conference Resort (hereinafter CMCR or simply defendant). CMCR employs approximately 500 people and, according to plaintiff, is used extensively by major corporations. In the summer of 1995, CMCR adopted a new Drag and Alcohol Testing Policy (the Policy). On July 7,1995, CMCR’s employees, including plaintiff, were given copies of the Policy and told that their written consent to the Policy and their adherence to its requirements…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- United Mine Workers of America v. GibbsSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Warth v. SeldinSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Carnegie-Mellon University v. CohillSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by126 opinions
- John Duda v. Board of Education of Franklin Park Public School District No. 84, John Barry, Dan PietriniCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
- Fish v. KobachCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
- Diane M. Cossette v. Minnesota Power & Light, an Employer and Business Corporation in the State of Minnesota Joseph C. BurtonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1999
- Williams v. Fedex Corporate ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2017
- Jeff Armstrong v. Turner Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1998
121 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.