Legal Opinion

Tommy Hopkins v. John Saunders

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided December 16, 1999No. 98-2803, 98-2948PublishedCited by 836 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WOLLMAN, Chief Judge.

Tommy D. Hopkins appeals from the district court’s denial of his claim for reinstatement and from the court’s failure to rule on his claims that John L. Saunders and other state officials (collectively, the officials) violated his rights under the First Amendment and Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 (Title VII). 42 U.S.C. §§ 2000e-2000e-17. 1 The officials cross-appeal, contending that the district court erred in finding that Hopkins had a property interest in his job and in awarding Hopkins nominal damages and attorney fees. We affirm in part and reverse in part.

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. Board of Regents of State Colleges v. RothSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Anderson v. City of Bessemer CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  5. Carey v. PiphusSupreme Court of the United States · 1978

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by836 opinions

  1. Stamm v. Cnty. of CheyenneDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2018
  2. Summers Mfg. Co. v. Tri-County AG, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Iowa · 2017
  3. Judy Doe v. Michael L. ParsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2020
  4. BNSF Ry. Co. v. Seats, Inc.District Court, D. Nebraska · 2019
  5. Moore v. YardelyDistrict Court, D. Nebraska · 2019

831 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API