Legal Opinion

R. E. Tr. Co. of Phila. v. Met. L. Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 5, 1940PublishedCited by 22 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

This action of assumpsit was brought by plaintiff to recover double indemnity upon four policies of life insurance issued by defendant to Dr. Samuel McClary, 3d, the insured, who died on September 20, 1936. The policies, which had a face value of $25,000 in the aggregate, contained identical clauses providing for the payment of double indemnity in the event that "the death of the insured resulted in consequence of bodily injury effected solely through external, violent and accidental means . . . independently and exclusively of all other causes." Provision was also made that: "This indemnity…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  2. Freeman v. Mercantile Mutual Accident Ass'nMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1892
  3. Hesse v. Traveler's Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1929
  4. Kelly v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  5. Arnstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1937

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. O'Neill v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1942
  2. Foulkrod v. Standard Accident InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  3. Harry L. Sheinman & Sons, Inc. v. Scranton Life Ins.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
  4. Rose v. HooverSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  5. Johnson v. Kentucky Central Life & Accident InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API