Legal Opinion

Hesse v. Traveler's Ins. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 4, 1929No. Appeal, 150PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Simpson,

Plaintiff, the beneficiary named in a policy of insurance issued by defendant, brought suit thereon; the trial judge entered a nonsuit, which the court in banc refused to set aside, and from that judgment the present appeal is taken. The policy insures “against loss resulting from bodily injuries, effected directly and independently of all other causes, through external, violent and accidental means,” and upon this clause plaintiff necessarily relies for recovery. In our opinion the judgment appealed from must be affirmed.

The facts regarding the insured’s death…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Northern Assurance Co. v. Grand View Building Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1902
  2. Kelley v. Pittsburgh Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Levinton v. Ohio Farmers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1920
  4. Smith v. National Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1883

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Urian v. Scranton Life Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1932
  2. Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Ferry v. Protective Indemnity Co. of New YorkSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1944
  4. Gulf Life Insurance Company v. NashSupreme Court of Florida · 1957
  5. Hagarty v. Wm. Akers, Jr., Co., Inc.Court of Judicial Discipline of Pennsylvania · 1941

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API