Legal Opinion

Arnstein v. Metropolitan Life Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 7, 1937No. Appeal, 230PublishedCited by 32 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Stern,

The policy of accident insurance in this case provided that defendant would pay the sum of $20,000 to the beneficiary if the insured lost his life as the result of bodily injuries “caused directly and independently of all other causes by violent and accidental means.” Among the risks excluded was death “caused wholly or partly, directly or indirectly, by disease or bodily .or mental infirmity or medical or surgical treatment therefor.”

Insured had an ingrown toenail. It was partly removed by a chiropodist. In order to heal it, insured exposed his foot to the rays of…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. United States Mutual Accident Ass'n v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1889
  2. Landress v. Phoenix Mutual Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  3. Silverstein v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
  4. Paul v. . Travelers' Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1889
  5. Lane v. Horn & Hardart Baking Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by32 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. MaloneSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
  2. Beckham v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967
  3. Kelly v. Prudential Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Mahon v. American Cas. Co. of ReadingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961
  5. Lucas v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API