Legal Opinion

Foulkrod v. Standard Accident Insurance

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 4, 1941No. Appeal, 196PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Drew,

This action in assumpsit was instituted by Gertrude A. Foulkrod to recover $5,250 for the accidental death of her husband, the insured, upon a policy of insurance issued by the Standard Accident Insurance Company, defendant. The policy contained a clause providing for the payment of that amount for death “effected directly, exclusively and independently of all other causes, through accidental means”. The jury found for plaintiff. After motions for judgment n. o. v. and a new trial had been overruled and judgment entered upon the verdict, this appeal by defendant was…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Riley v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1923
  2. Eby v. Travelers InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  3. Kelley v. Pittsburgh Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  4. Heath v. KlostermanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1941
  5. R. E. Tr. Co. of Phila. v. Met. L. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Cody v. S.K.F. Industries, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1972
  2. Commonwealth v. BodenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1960
  3. Sutherland v. Kroger CompanyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1959
  4. Moore v. Atlanta Transit System, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1961
  5. Mahon v. American Cas. Co. of ReadingNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1961

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API