Legal Opinion

Groeneveld v. Camano Blue Point Oyster Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 11, 1938No. 27116. Department OnePublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSimpson, J.

— The purpose of this action was to quiet title to certain second class tide lands that plaintiffs claim to own in Port Susan.

Plaintiffs allege that, by deed from the state dated August 8, 1912, their predecessor in interest acquired certain second class tide lands situated in front of, adjacent to, and abutting upon those, portions of the United States government meander line described as follows, to-wit:

“All of the said meander line lying in front of Sections 35 & 36, in Township 32 North of Range 3, E. W. M., in Snohomish County, Washington, and Section 1, Township 31 North, Range 3 E. W.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. ScottWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  2. State ex rel. Lehman v. BridgesWashington Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Lundell v. Allen & Nelson Mill Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Strand v. StateWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Fosburgh v. SandoWashington Supreme Court · 1946
  3. Marchel v. BungerCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1975
  4. Conrad/Dommel, LLC v. West Development Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2003
  5. Bonded Adjustment Co. v. EdmundsWashington Supreme Court · 1947

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API