Legal Opinion

Tenco, Inc. v. Manning

Washington Supreme Court

Decided January 25, 1962No. 35747PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFinley, C. J.

In this action, based on a real-estate earnest-money agreement, the trial court ordered the defendant-owner and purported vendor to convey certain real property to plaintiff-purchaser, Tenco, Inc. This appeal by the defendant-vendor followed.

Appellant, purported vendor, is a resident of Baker, Oregon, and owns real property situated in Island County, Washington, which may be legally described as follows:

“Lots 1 to 15 inclusive and Lot 40, Admiralty Heights, according to the recorded plat thereof in the Office of the Auditor of Island County, Washington, in Volume 5 of Plats, page 8.”

Lots 1 to…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Thorndike v. Hesperian Orchards, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Martin v. SeigelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  3. Bigelow v. MoodWashington Supreme Court · 1960
  4. Martinson v. CruikshankWashington Supreme Court · 1940
  5. Peterson v. PaulsonWashington Supreme Court · 1945

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Leonard v. Washington Employers, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1969
  2. Shrum v. ZeltwangerWyoming Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Key Design Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  4. Key Design, Inc. v. MoserWashington Supreme Court · 1999
  5. Rocky Mountain Fire & Casualty Co. v. RoseWashington Supreme Court · 1963

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API