Doherty v. Retirement Board of Medford
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.
In a hearing before the retirement board of Medford (board), the plaintiff was found guilty of misappropriating funds from the city of Medford, pursuant to G. L. c. 32, § 15 (1), thereby losing his entitlement to recover retirement deductions accumulated during his years as a police officer. Both the District Court and the Superior Court judges upheld this decision. Doherty claims that the board’s decision should be reviewed pursuant to a writ of mandamus; the board proceedings improperly deprived him of his right to a jury trial; the board’s decision was unsupported by the evidence; and his…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Pernell v. Southall RealtySupreme Court of the United States · 1974
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by45 opinions
- Stonehill College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- Boston Medical Center Corp. v. Secretary of the Executive Office of Health & Human ServicesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
- Arthur Joseph Sheehan v. James Marr, Police Chief, City of GloucesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
- MacLean v. State Board of RetirementMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
- State Board of Retirement v. BulgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.