Legal Opinion

Doherty v. Retirement Board of Medford

Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court

Decided June 5, 1997PublishedCited by 45 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFried, J.

In a hearing before the retirement board of Medford (board), the plaintiff was found guilty of misappropriating funds from the city of Medford, pursuant to G. L. c. 32, § 15 (1), thereby losing his entitlement to recover retirement deductions accumulated during his years as a police officer. Both the District Court and the Superior Court judges upheld this decision. Doherty claims that the board’s decision should be reviewed pursuant to a writ of mandamus; the board proceedings improperly deprived him of his right to a jury trial; the board’s decision was unsupported by the evidence; and his…

2Cases cited39 opinions

  1. National Labor Relations Board v. Jones & Laughlin Steel Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1937
  2. Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. United States v. UrserySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
  4. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  5. Pernell v. Southall RealtySupreme Court of the United States · 1974

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by45 opinions

  1. Stonehill College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
  2. Boston Medical Center Corp. v. Secretary of the Executive Office of Health & Human ServicesMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2012
  3. Arthur Joseph Sheehan v. James Marr, Police Chief, City of GloucesterCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2000
  4. MacLean v. State Board of RetirementMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2000
  5. State Board of Retirement v. BulgerMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API