Legal Opinion
Stonehill College v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided May 6, 2004PublishedCited by 84 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
These cases arise under G. L. c. 151B. In each case, the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination (MCAD or commission) entered decisions finding the respondents liable for employment discrimination and awarded relief including damages for emotional distress. The respondents have sought judicial review of the MCAD’s decision pursuant to G. L. c. 151B, § 6, in accordance with standards set forth in G. L. c. 30A, § 14, and also have sought jury trials in the Superior Court, pursuant to this court’s decision in Lavelle v. Massachusetts Comm’n Against Discrimination, 426 Mass. 332 (1997)…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Granfinanciera, S.A. v. NordbergSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Curtis v. LoetherSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Desist v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Panama Railroad v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Atlas Roofing Co. v. Occupational Safety and Health Review Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by84 opinions
- Ayash v. Dana-Farber Cancer InstituteMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2005
- Sirva Relocation, LLC v. Golar RichieCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2015
- Klairmont v. Gainsboro Restaurant, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2013
- Bamberg v. Goldman, Sachs & Co.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2014
- Thurdin v. SEI Boston, LLCMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2008
79 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.