Legal Opinion

People v. Harrison

California Supreme Court

Decided October 31, 2013No. S199830PublishedCited by 44 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

BAXTER, J.

Penal Code section 2962, which is part of the Mentally Disordered Offender (MDO) Act, requires civil commitment of a state prisoner during and after parole when a chief psychiatrist of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation has certified that the prisoner suffers from a severe mental disorder that is not or cannot be kept in remission without treatment, that the disorder was one of the causes of or an aggravating factor in the prisoner’s qualifying crime, that the prisoner has been in treatment for the disorder for at least 90 days within the year preceding release…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. People v. PoseyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004
  2. People v. MurphyCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. People v. McKeeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Manduley v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2002
  5. In Re QawiCalifornia Supreme Court · 2004

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by44 opinions

  1. People v. ScottCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  2. People v. BlackburnCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  3. People v. StevensCalifornia Supreme Court · 2015
  4. People v. ArriagaCalifornia Supreme Court · 2014
  5. Millview County Water District v. State Water Resources Control BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2014

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API