McLean v. Baldwin
California Supreme Court
The.facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
HAYNES, C.
Action to quiet title. The plaintiff had findings and judgment in her favor, and defendant Baldwin appeals from the judgment and from an order denying a new trial. Defendant Garvey made default, and Temple entered a disclaimer.
On February 15, 1887, defendant John H. Temple, claiming to be the owner, occupied a parcel of land containing about seventy-six acres (familiarly known as the Temple Homestead), lying partly within the Rancho La Merced, owned by said Baldwin, and partly within the Rancho de Felipe Lugo, owned by said Baldwin and one Richard Garvey, as tenants in common; and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Cave v. CraftsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1878
- Helm v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Baldwin v. TempleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
- Brown v. CampbellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
- Burnham v. StoneCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Baird v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
- Stearns v. Los Angeles City School DistrictCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
- Wehle v. PriceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Spitzer v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1925
- McLean v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907