Legal Opinion

Spitzer v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided October 1, 1925No. Docket No. 5222PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCashin, J.

An original application for a writ of prohibition to prevent the entry by the Superior Court in and for the County of Alameda of a final decree of divorce in an action pending therein entitled “Hazel M. Spitzer, Plaintiff, v. Sidney Spitzer, Defendant

The defendant, who is the petitioner herein, and plaintiff intermarried in the territory of Hawaii during the year 1917 and lived together therein until the month of June, 1920, when a separation occurred, petitioner remaining in that territory, while his wife with the minor child of the marriage came to California and has since resided in the…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Thompson v. WhitmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
  2. Wisconsin v. Pelican InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  3. Andrews v. AndrewsSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
  4. Rose v. HimelySupreme Court of the United States · 1808
  5. Van Hoosear v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Wolfsen v. HathawayCalifornia Supreme Court · 1948
  2. Rideaux v. TorgrimsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Weil v. BarthelCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  4. Baird v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1928
  5. Helbush v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API