Burnham v. Stone
California Supreme Court
Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of San Diego County, denying a new trial. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the Court
Haynes, C.—
Appeal from an order denying the motion of the defendant, James Stone, for a new trial.
The action was brought by John H. Burnham and-his two minor children to recover damages for the alleged wrongful killing of Jenny Burnham, the wife of the plaintiff, John H. Burnham, and the mother of the minor plaintiffs.
The third paragraph of the complaint is as follows:
*166“ That on the eighteenth day of January, 1888, the said defendants, Levi P. Stone, James Stone, George Morris, D. M. Breedlove, Arch Freeman, and W. H. H. Dinwiddle, maliciously, willfully, fraudulently, and unlawfully…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Simms v. SlacumSupreme Court of the United States · 1806
- Low v. ElwellMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
- Helm v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1888
- Murdock v. ClarkeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
- Jackson ex dem. Stansbury v. FarmerNew York Supreme Court · 1832
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Livesey v. StockCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929
- Walker v. ChanslorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1908
- Milwaukee Mechanics' Ins. Co. v. WarrenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1907
- MacLeod v. Fox West Coast Theatres Corp.California Supreme Court · 1937
- Frazzini v. CableCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1931
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.