Legal Opinion

McLean v. Baldwin

California Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1907No. L.A. Nos. 1648, 1573Published

APPEALS from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County from an order refusing to render a different judgment and from an order refusing a new trial. M. T. Allen, Judge. . The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtMcFARLAND, J.

This is an action to quiet title to a certain piece of land. The defendant Garvey made default, and defendant Temple disclaimed. Defendant Baldwin answered, denying that plaintiff had any title or right to the premises described in the complaint, averring his ownership thereof, setting up a certain judgment in bar of plaintiff’s action, and praying for judgment decreeing that plaintiff has no title to said land, and that defendant is the owner thereof. The trial court found that plaintiff had no title or right to or in the premises, or any part thereof, and that defendant was the owner of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. McLean v. BaldwinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1902

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API