Legal Opinion

State v. Allen

Supreme Judicial Court of Maine

Decided March 2, 2006PublishedCited by 33 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSilver, J.

[¶ 1] Sarah Allen appeals from a judgment of conviction for manslaughter, 17-A M.R.S. § 203(1)(A) (2005), after a jury verdict entered in the Superior Court (An-droscoggin County, Gorman, J.). Allen contends that the court erred in prohibiting an expert defense witness from testifying about recent test results as a discovery sanction, and in allowing the State to introduce evidence of a spanking that Allen’s husband inflicted on their son the night before the son suffered injuries that ultimately led to his death. 1 Allen also argues that the evidence was insufficient to convict. We disagree…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Taylor v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  2. DeJesus v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1995
  3. State v. BrewerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1985
  4. State v. LockhartSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2003
  5. State v. ArdolinoSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1997

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by33 opinions

  1. State v. ReeseSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010
  2. State of Maine v. Thomas P. WoodardSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2013
  3. State v. AllenSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2006
  4. In re Evelyn A.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2017
  5. State v. FillerSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2010

28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API