Legal Opinion
Covington v. Pritchett
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided August 30, 1988No. C1-88-266PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
WOZNIAK, Chief Judge.
This is an appeal from an order and judgment canceling a contract for deed between appellant James Pritchett and respondents Dale and Linda Covington. Pritchett contends the trial court erred in failing to allow him to recover funds paid to cover contract payments after the Cov-ingtons’ default and also erred in failing to allow recovery of funds equaling the reasonable rental value of the property. We affirm.
FACTS
In 1980, Pritchett and his wife purchased a home from John and Rosemary Rawson pursuant to a contract for deed. They purchased the property for $90,000,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- First National Bank v. FlynnSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1933
- Wayzata Enterprises, Inc. v. HermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1964
- Templin v. Crestliner, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Kosbau v. DressCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987
- Rein v. Town of Spring LakeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1966
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Rudnitski v. SeelySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Porter v. SmithNebraska Supreme Court · 1992
- Summit House Co. v. GershmanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1993
- Drewes v. First National Bank of Detroit LakesCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1990
- Rudnitski v. SeelyCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1989