Legal Opinion

Rudnitski v. Seely

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided August 25, 1989No. C0-89-43PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

RANDALL, Judge.

This is an appeal from a summary judgment. The trial court ruled that the election of remedies doctrine precludes a vendor of real property from asserting a claim for waste to that property once the vendor has cancelled the contract and recovered the property. The trial court also ruled that the election of remedies doctrine precludes an action for conversion of personal property following cancellation of a contract for deed. We reverse and remand for trial on the merits.

FACTS

On August 20, 1980, respondent Elizabeth Seely (the buyer) executed a contract for deed with…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Betlach v. Wayzata CondominiumSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1979
  2. Nord v. HerreidSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
  3. Johnson v. UrieSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1987
  4. Meyer v. HansenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Hildegarde, Inc. v. WrightSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1955

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rudnitski v. SeelySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API