Legal Opinion

Aplin v. Stiles

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 1890PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Newaygo. (Palmer, J.) Petition for sale of delinquent tax lands under Act No. 195, Laws of 1889. Defendants appeal. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtGrant, J.

This is a proceeding by petition, under the general tax law of 1889, Act No. 195 (3 How. Stat. *462p. 2936), for the sale of lands delinquent for the non-payment of the taxes assessed thereon for the year 1887.

Four objections are made to the validity of the proceedings:

1. The title to the act, and the law itself, embrace two objects, and are therefore in violation of section 20 of Article 4 of the Constitution, that “no law shall embrace more than one object, which shall be expressed in its title."

2. The court did not acquire jurisdiction by the service of its subpoena upon the defendants, who…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. First National Bank v. Township of St. JosephMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Avery v. City of East SaginawMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  3. People ex rel. Estes v. DenahyMichigan Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. City of Beaumont v. Gulf States Utilities Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1942
  2. McCamey v. CummingsTennessee Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Hudson-Webber Realty Co. v. City of SouthfieldMichigan Court of Appeals · 1969
  4. Tisdale v. AplinMichigan Supreme Court · 1891

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API