Legal Opinion

People ex rel. Estes v. Denahy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 10, 1870PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Application for mandamus: By Charles H. Estes, Commissioner appointed under the act of 1867 (No. Jfll, p. 964-), appropriating certain nonresident highway taxes for the improvement of certain State roads, and providing for the construction and improvement thereof, to compel John Denahy, Treasurer of the township of Elk Rapids, to pay to the relator, certain moneys in the possession of Denahy, and which the relator claims, were appropriated to the improvement of the Traverse…

Read the full summary

Application for mandamus: By Charles H. Estes, Commissioner appointed under the act of 1867 (No. Jfll, p. 964-), appropriating certain nonresident highway taxes for the improvement of certain State roads, and providing for the construction and improvement thereof, to compel John Denahy, Treasurer of the township of Elk Rapids, to pay to the relator, certain moneys in the possession of Denahy, and which the relator claims, were appropriated to the improvement of the Traverse Bay and Houghton Lake State Road, — one of the roads mentioned in the act.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, J.

• The relator in this case is the Commissioner appointed by the G-overnor for the purpose of receiving and expending the moneys appropriated to the Traverse Bay and Houghton Lake State Road by “an act appropriating certain non-resident highway taxes for the improvement of certain State roads, and providing for the construction and improvement thereof,” approved March 27,1867. Laws 1867, vol. 2 p. 964. The respondent is Township Treasurer of the township of Elk Rapids, and has in his possession certain of the moneys, which, by the act aforesaid, were appropriated to the Traverse Bay and…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People ex rel. Drake v. MahaneyMichigan Supreme Court · 1865
  2. State ex rel. Weir v. County JudgeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1855

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Ballentyne v. WickershamSupreme Court of Alabama · 1883
  2. State v. MorganSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Black & White Taxicab Co. v. Standard Oil Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1923
  4. Crabbs v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  5. Oxnard Beet Sugar Co. v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1905

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API