Legal Opinion

Hudson-Webber Realty Co. v. City of Southfield

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided June 25, 1969No. Docket 4,800PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDanhof, J.

Plaintiff commenced an action for refund of property taxes paid under protest as permitted under the authority of § 53 of the General Property Tax Act, 1 a part of which provides that a person paying under protest may sue for the amount paid and recover if the tax or special assessment is shown to be illegal. There was a trial court judgment of no cause of action.

On appeal plaintiff contends that the so-called “freeze” statute, being § 152 of the General Property Tax Act, 2 applies and also that the assessments giving rise to the taxes are such that they amount to substantially constructive…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Twenty-Two Charlotte, Inc. v. City of DetroitMichigan Supreme Court · 1940
  2. Allied Supermarkets, Inc. v. State Tax CommissionMichigan Supreme Court · 1969
  3. Aplin v. StilesMichigan Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Tp. of Wayne v. Robbie's, Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1972
  2. Fisher-New Center Co. v. DetroitMichigan Court of Appeals · 1972
  3. Grand Rapids Steel & Supply Co. v. City of Grand RapidsMichigan Court of Appeals · 1971

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API