Legal Opinion

First National Bank v. Township of St. Joseph

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided October 5, 1881PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Error to Berrien. Assumpsit. Defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCampbell, J.

The township of St. Joseph sued the plaintiff in error for the tax due on shares of William E. Higman for the year 1880, and recovered judgment therefor, which now comes up on error. The tax is resisted partly for alleged insufficiencies in the proceedings, and partly because it is insisted the tax is invalid entirely.

It is claimed the tax collection was illegally extended. It appears that there was no township clerk, and that at a meeting of the board one Junius H. Hatch, a justice of the peace, being summoned to be present as a member, was appointed to act as clerk or secretary, and in that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. People v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
  2. Sibley v. SmithMichigan Supreme Court · 1853
  3. Hutchinson v. PrattSupreme Court of Vermont · 1839
  4. Williams v. WeaverSupreme Court of the United States · 1880

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Ward v. AlsupTennessee Supreme Court · 1898
  2. State Tax-Law CasesMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Reid v. Southern Development Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1906
  4. State ex rel. Farmers State Bank v. WallaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Auditor General v. ChandlerMichigan Supreme Court · 1896

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API