Hays v. Merchants Bank
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from Superior Court, Jefferson County.
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Stiles, J.
This was an appeal from the decision of the state board of equalization and appeal in a tide-land contest. The action of the board was reversed by the superior court, and the first point made here by the appellant is that the court could not take cognizance of the appeal because of the failure of the law to prescribe a method of procedure in such cases. We have had occasion in State ex. rel. Smith v. Forrest, 8 Wash. 610 (36 Pac. 686), and in McKenzie v. Woodin, 9 Wash. 414 (37 Pac. 663), to comment upon some of the deficiencies and…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- McMillan v. RichardsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1858
- Curtis v. Millard & Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1862
- Dray v. DrayOregon Supreme Court · 1891
- State ex rel. Smith v. ForrestWashington Supreme Court · 1894
- McKenzie v. WoodinWashington Supreme Court · 1894
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rogoski v. HammondCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
- Hays v. Merchants' National Bank of Port TownsendWashington Supreme Court · 1896
- State ex rel. McAvoy v. GilliamWashington Supreme Court · 1910
- Knowles v. RogersWashington Supreme Court · 1902
- Board of Church Erection Fund of the General Assembly of the Presbyterian Church in the United States v. First Presbyterian ChurchWashington Supreme Court · 1898
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.