Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Smith v. Forrest

Washington Supreme Court

Decided April 21, 1894No. 1248PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Original Application for Mandamus.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Stiles, J.

— The petitioner, who shows himself to be a qualified person, asks that the respondent, who is the commissioner of public lands, be required to receive §182.16 in full payment for certain tide lands, and issue a certificate of purchase to him therefor, in accordance with the provisions of the second proviso of Gen. Stat., § 2172.

The petition shows that in 1884 petitioner took possession of two separate tracts of tide land in Totten’s Inlet, Mason county, under the provisions of the territorial law to encourage the cultivation of oysters (Code…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State ex rel. Morse v. ForrestWashington Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Hays v. Merchants BankWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. State ex rel. Megler v. ForrestWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  3. Williams Fishing Co. v. SavidgeWashington Supreme Court · 1929
  4. Williams Fishing Co. v. SavidgeWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. State ex rel. Smith v. ForrestWashington Supreme Court · 1895

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API