Rogoski v. Hammond
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the CourtHorowitz, J.
— The basic question here is whether due process objections to prejudgment attachment based on RCW 7.12.020(10) are overcome by the preliminary use of a show cause hearing procedure under RCW 2.28.150.
On July 14, 1972, plaintiff Rogoski commenced an action against defendant Hammond for $3,000 in unpaid rent allegedly owing under a written lease, plus attorney’s fees. Concurrently, plaintiff obtained an order directing defendant to show cause within 8 days why a writ of attachment should not issue directing the King County sheriff to “attach and safely keep all the property of the said…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Morrissey v. BrewerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Goldberg v. KellySupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Bell v. BursonSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Sniadach v. Family Finance Corp. of Bay ViewSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Uni-Com Northwest, Ltd. v. Argus Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1987
- Clearwater v. Skyline Construction Co.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1992
- Abad v. CozzaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Abad v. CozzaWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Pay 'N Save Corp. v. EadsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.