Legal Opinion

Dickson v. Conde

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1897No. 18,082PublishedCited by 5 opinions

From the Marion Superior Court.

1Opinion of the CourtMonks, J.

Appellant brought this action against appellees upon a written contract. Appellees’ separate demurrers to the complaint were sustained, and appellant refusing to plead further, judgment was rendered upon demurrer in favor of appellees.

These rulings of the court have been assigned as error.

It is shown by the complaint that prior to April 29, 1876, appellant and the appellee, Wallace Dickson, *280were doing business as partners under the firm name of C. Dickson & Co. That on said day, by contract in writing, appellees purchased of appellant his entire interest in the stock, good will, and accounts…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Wolke v. FlemingIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. Turpie v. LoweIndiana Supreme Court · 1888
  3. Bateman v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
  4. Lowe v. HamiltonIndiana Supreme Court · 1892
  5. Boruff v. HudsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Boland v. ClaudelIndiana Supreme Court · 1914
  2. Lake County Trust Co. v. WineIndiana Court of Appeals · 1998
  3. Artukovich v. Pacific States Cast Iron Pipe Co.California Court of Appeal · 1947
  4. Hauser v. GeorgeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1935
  5. Solon v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1908

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API