Legal Opinion
GALLO CATTLE COMPANY v. Kawamura
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 1, 2008No. C053067PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
BUTZ, J.
This case concerns the constitutionality, under the California Constitution’s right to freedom of speech, 1 of use of milk producer assessments, authorized by statute, for generic advertising to stimulate sales of milk. The validity of such commodity advertising, under the federal Constitution, recently came before the United States Supreme Court in Johanns v. Livestock Marketing Assn. (2005) 544 U.S. 550 [161 L.Ed.2d 896, 125 S.Ct. 2055] (Johanns). We will decide to follow the reasoning in Johanns in applying the California Constitution’s freedom of speech clause. We will also…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Perry v. SindermannSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Rust v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Laird v. TatumSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Jerry Beeman & Pharmacy Services, Inc. v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2011
- King v. JohnstonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Kaye v. Board of Trustees of San Diego County Public Law LibraryCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
- Delano Farms Co. v. Cal. Table Grape CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.