Jerry Beeman & Pharmacy Services, Inc. v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by Judge B. FLETCHER; Dissent by Judge WARDLAW.
OPINION
B. FLETCHER, Circuit Judge:
In this consolidated appeal, defendants-appellants (collectively “Defendants”) appeal the denial by the district court of their motions for judgment on the pleadings. Plaintiffs-appellees (collectively “Plaintiffs”) brought this diversity suit against Defendants to enforce California Civil Code §§ 2527 and 2528. These statutes require Defendants to supply the results of bi-annual studies of California pharmacies’ retail drug pricing for private uninsured customers to their clients, who are third-party…
2Cases cited38 opinions
- Vaden v. Discover BankSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Hurley v. Irish-American Gay, Lesbian and Bisexual Group of Boston, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Keller v. State Bar of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
33 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Retail Digital Network v. Jacob AppelsmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2016
- Jerry Beeman & Pharmacy Servs., Inc. v. Caremark Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2018
- CTIA—The Wireless Ass'n v. City & County of San FranciscoDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2011
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.