Legal Opinion
Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLC
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided June 6, 2012No. 07-56692, 07-56693PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
Appellants’ request to modify the counsel listing in the Appendix to the Court’s June 6, 2012 Order is GRANTED. The order filed June 6, 2012 is amended by deleting the current Appendix and adding a new Appendix as follows:
APPENDIX
Counsel for Plaintiffs-Appellees
Michael A. Bowse
Browne George Ross LLP
2121 Avenue of the Stars, Suite 2400
Los Angeles, California 90067
Alan M. Mansfield
The Consumer Law Group
10200 Willow Creek Road, Suite 160
San Diego, California 92131
Counsel for Defendant-Appellant Express Scripts, Inc.
Theodore J. Boutrous, Jr.
Gail E. Lees
Christopher Chorba
Gibson, Dunn &…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Auto Equity Sales, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
- Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic and Institutional Rights, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2006
- Riley v. National Federation of Blind of North Carolina, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Sorrell v. IMS Health Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2011
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Lauren Casola v. Dexcom, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2024
- Tait v. BSH Home Appliances Corp.District Court, C.D. California · 2012
- Beeman v. Anthem Prescription Management, LLCCalifornia Supreme Court · 2013
- Isabelle Franklin v. Cmty. Regl Med. Ctr.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2021
- Jack Potter v. City of LaceyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2022
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.