Legal Opinion

Jose Lopez v. City of Santa Ana

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided October 6, 2017No. 16-55216UnpublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM **

Jose Manuel Lopez appeals pro se from the district court’s judgment dismissing his 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985 action alleging federal and state law claims. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de novo a dismissal under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(c). United States v. Teng Jiao Zhou, 815 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2016). We affirm.

The district court properly dismissed Lopez’s §§ 1983 and 1985 claims for false arrest and false imprisonment on the basis of the applicable statute of limitations because Lopez’s elaims accrued more than two years before he filed this action. See…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Wallace v. KatoSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  2. Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
  3. Padgett v. WrightCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  4. Lukovsky v. City and County of San FranciscoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
  5. Pedrina v. ChunCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. (PS) Butler v. County of ShastaDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  2. (PS) Nible v. MacomberDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. (PS) Nible v. MacomberDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  4. Lecia L. Shorter v. County of Los AngelesDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2021
  5. Sorour v. PNC Bank, N.A.District Court, N.D. California · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API