Legal Opinion

(PS) Nible v. Macomber

District Court, E.D. California

Decided January 27, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01259Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM NYLE NIBLE, Case No. 2:24-cv-01259-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, 13 v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS TO GRANT DEFENDANT RASKIN-LI’S 14 JEFF MACOMBER, et al., MOTION TO DISMISS 15 Defendants. 16 (ECF No. 30) 17 Pending before the Court is Defendant Julie Raskin-Li’s1 motion to dismiss 18 pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 12(b)(6), which is fully briefed. (ECF Nos. 19 30, 36, 37, 39).2 A hearing was held on January 21, 2025. For the reasons stated below, 20 the Court recommends GRANTING…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. West v. AtkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
  5. Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API