Legal Opinion
Padgett v. Wright
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 20, 2009No. 08-16720PublishedCited by 1,173 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER AND OPINION
ORDER
The mandate in this case and the opinion filed on October 14, 2009, are hereby withdrawn. The opinion filed concurrently with this order will replace the October 14, 2009, opinion, and mandate shall issue forthwith.
OPINION
2Per curiam
A Curtis Wright appeals the district court’s denial of his motion for summary judgment on the ground of qualified immunity in this § 1983 action. After this qualified immunity appeal was filed, the case went to trial, and a jury found Wright hable to appellee Joseph Padgett for deprivation of his First Amendment rights. We dismiss this appeal.
Generally,…
3Cases cited8 opinions
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Mitchell v. ForsythSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Price v. KramerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- Jones-Hamilton Co., a California Corporation v. Beazer Materials & Services, Inc. Kop-Coat, Inc., a Pennsylvania Corporation Koppers Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Robert Chuman v. Craig A. Wright, and Mark P. FronterottaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by1,173 opinions
- Heriberto Rodriguez v. County of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2018
- Plyam v. Precision Development, LLC (In Re Plyam)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
- Charles Barnard v. Greg TheobaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013
- Esteban Aleman Gonzalez v. William BarrCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2020
- United States v. Sierra Pacific Industries, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2017
1,168 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.