Legal Opinion
(PS) Nible v. Macomber
District Court, E.D. California
Decided July 3, 2025No. 2:24-cv-01259Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 WILLIAM LYLE NIBLE, Case No. 2:24-cv-01259-DJC-CSK 12 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS 13 v. (ECF Nos. 51, 67, 74, 75) 14 JEFF MACOMBER, et al., 15 Defendants. 16 17 18 Plaintiff William Lyle Nible is proceeding in this action pro se.1 Pending before the 19 Court are the following motions: (A) Defendants Jeffrey Macomber, Tommee Dorsey, 20 Broomfield, St. Louis-Franklin, Stephanie Reyes, C. Lugar’s (collectively, “California 21 State Defendants”) motion to dismiss pursuant to Federal Rules of…
2Cases cited56 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Winter v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2008
- Gilbert B. Martinez v. Eddie Ylst, Superintendent, California Medical Facility SouthCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- Wolff v. McDonnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.