Legal Opinion

Schall v. Schall

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided October 9, 1951PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFritz, C. J.

After the hearing pursuant to Elsie Schall’s application on November 21, 1950, why the judgment entered May 31, 1949, should not be reopened and alimony for the wife determined, Judge Darling stated:

“While the record in this case ‘speaks for itself,’ it seems advisable, to me, to set forth briefly the history of this action before addressing the issues now presented to the court for determination. With such historical facts recalled, I think it will then be legitimate to speculate as to the considerations which prompted the court to make the determination from which the present proceedings…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Bassett v. BassettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Dillon v. DillonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1943
  3. Gray v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  4. Hannon v. HannonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1939

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978
  2. Kronforst v. KronforstWisconsin Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Schwab v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1969
  4. Clayton v. TraverWisconsin Supreme Court · 1958
  5. Becker v. BeckerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API