Legal Opinion

Hannon v. Hannon

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided March 7, 1939PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFairchild, J.

In the divorce action, the defendant put in no answer. She appeared by her attorney and entered into negotiations for a division of estate. The husband owned stock worth between $975 and $1,525, insurance with some loan or paid-up value, household goods, and an automobile. The judgment of divorce provided that as a final division of property the plaintiff should pay or cause to be paid to' the defendant the sum of $1,800.

When the defendant later applied to the court to have this judgment set aside, she contended that the complaint did not state facts sufficient to constitute a cause of action…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bacon v. BaconWisconsin Supreme Court · 1877
  2. Lally v. LallyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Bassett v. BassettWisconsin Supreme Court · 1898
  4. Hiecke v. HieckeWisconsin Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Kistler v. KistlerWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Warner v. WarnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Gray v. GrayWisconsin Supreme Court · 1942
  3. Schall v. SchallWisconsin Supreme Court · 1951
  4. Olivieri v. EscartínSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1956
  5. Friedmann v. Tax CommissionWisconsin Supreme Court · 1940

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API