Legal Opinion
Kawahara v. Yokohama Specie Bank, Ltd.
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 2, 1948No. Civ. 13727PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtNourse, P. J.
Petitioners appeal from the order denying their petition to intervene in a proceeding in which the liquidator of the San Francisco and Los Angeles offices of the above bank petitioned for leave to pay an 80 per cent dividend on claims against those offices, and from the order granting such petition of the liquidator.
From the petition of the liquidator it appears that the Yokohama Specie Bank (hereafter called the bank) was a Japanese corporation authorized to do a deposit banking business in California pursuant to section 7 of the Bank Act, 1 Deering’s General Laws, Act 652 [Stats. 1909, p.…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Elliott v. Superior Court of Cal.California Supreme Court · 1914
- Braun v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
- Hibernia Savings & Loan Society v. ChurchillCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
- Allen v. California Water & Telephone Co.California Supreme Court · 1947
- Rhoda v. Alameda Cty.California Supreme Court · 1877
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Bowles v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- Timberidge Enterprises, Inc. v. City of Santa RosaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1978
- Northern California Psychiatric Society v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
- McClearen v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
- People v. Superior Court (Good)California Supreme Court · 1976
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.