Legal Opinion
In re Complaint of OHIOTELNET.COM, INC. v. Windstream Ohio, Inc.
Ohio Supreme Court
Decided October 29, 2013No. 2012-0027PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtO’Connor, C.J.
Summary
{¶ 1} Appellant, OHIOTELNET.COM, INC. (“Ohiotelnet”), is a competitive local exchange carrier and provides telephone and other telecommunications services in Licking and surrounding counties in Ohio. Intervening appellee, Windstream Ohio, Inc., is an incumbent local exchange carrier that sells telecommunications services at both wholesale and retail prices. Ohiotelnet purchases services from Windstream at wholesale rates and resells the services to end-user consumers at retail rates.
{¶ 2} Ohiotelnet filed a complaint with the Public Utilities Commission (“PUCO” or “commission”)…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Office of Consumers' Counsel v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1979
- Utility Service Partners, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2009
- Constellation NewEnergy, Inc. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Monongahela Power Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 2004
- Ohio Edison Co. v. Public Utilities CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1997
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Olthaus v. NiesenOhio Court of Appeals · 2023
- Twang, L.L.C. v. CincinnatiOhio Court of Appeals · 2024
- In re Estate of JosephOhio Court of Appeals · 2025
- In re T.E.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2026