Legal Opinion
Ceci v. National Indemnity Co.
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided February 18, 1992No. 10112PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff, Michael Ceci, appeals from the trial court’s decision confirming an arbitration award rendered in favor of the defendant insurance company. The trial court concluded that because the policy was unambiguous, the plaintiff was not covered *662by the policy issued to his employer, Victor Ceci Refuse, Inc., a family owned business. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The trial court found the following facts. On September 13, 1986, the plaintiff was a pedestrian when he was struck by an underinsured motorist. He requested uninsured motorist benefits pursuant to a business…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Downs v. National Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1959
- Schultz v. Hartford Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Kaysen v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1978
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Ceci v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1993
- Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. SenaConnecticut Superior Court · 1992
- Qsp, Inc. v. Aetna Casualty Surety Co., No. 326873 (Dec. 7, 1998)Connecticut Superior Court · 1998
- Ceci v. National Indemnity Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
- Parnell v. Nationwide Mutual Ins.Spotsylvania County Circuit Court · 1998