Legal Opinion
Schultz v. Hartford Fire Insurance
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided February 13, 1990No. 13668PublishedCited by 54 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtArthur H. Healey, J.
The principal issue in this case is whether an endorsement to an owners’, landlords’ and tenants’ liability insurance policy amends or adds to the policy provisions defining insured premises. The trial court, Ryan, J., found the definition of insured premises in the endorsement controlling and interpreted the provision so as to deny the plaintiff relief under the insurance policy. From this judgment, the plaintiff appealed to the Appellate Court. Pursuant to Practice Book § 4023, we transferred the case to this court. We find no error.
The parties stipulated to the following facts. On August…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. United States Fire Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1981
- Beckenstein v. Potter & Carrier, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
- Waterbury Petroleum Products, Inc. v. Canaan Oil & Fuel Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Izzo v. Colonial Penn InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
- Beach v. Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1987
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Western World Insurance Company v. Stack Oil, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1990
- Hammer v. Lumberman's Mutual Casualty Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1990
- Aetna Life & Casualty Co. v. BulaongSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Middlesex Mutual Assurance Co. v. WalshSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1991
- Water & Way Properties v. Colt's Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.