Legal Opinion
State v. Robideaux
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 7, 1991No. Cr. 910123PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
The defendant, Darrell Robideaux, appealed from the order of the District Court for Grand Forks County denying his motion to dismiss the charge against him based upon the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth Amendment to the United States Constitution. We dismiss the appeal.
On March 12, 1991, Robideaux entered a plea of guilty to a violation of section 39-08-04 of the North Dakota Century Code of failing to report and leaving the scene of an accident. 1 The plea for violation of 39-08-04, N.D.C.C., was entered in Grand Forks County Court. Robideaux was also charged on…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Abney v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Grady v. CorbinSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Price v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- City of Riverside v. SmudaNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
- Hovey v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1990
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. BellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2000
- City of Grand Forks v. RiemersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2008
- State v. WhitmanNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. RobideauxNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Kiker v. WaltersNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.