Legal Opinion
City of Riverside v. Smuda
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided October 31, 1983No. Crim. 941PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
The defendant, Linda S. Smuda, appealed from a sentence imposed by the County Court of Cass County after she was found guilty by a jury of the offense of criminal mischief, a violation of a City of Riverside municipal ordinance. We dismiss the appeal.
Smuda was convicted originally in municipal court. She was fined $75 and ordered to make restitution for damages resulting from the commission of the offense in the amount of $78.12. Smuda thereafter appealed the conviction to the county court as permitted by Section 40-18-19, N.D.C.C., and Rule 37, N.D.R.Crim.P., and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- North Carolina v. PearceSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Duncan v. LouisianaSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Colten v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Ludwig v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- In re R. Y.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. OrrNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
- State v. EnnisNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1990
- City of Bismarck v. FettigNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1999
- First Trust Co. of North Dakota v. ConwayNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1984
- State v. NaceNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.