Legal Opinion
Kiker v. Walters
North Dakota Supreme Court
Decided March 27, 1992No. Civ. 910027PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice.
William D. Walters, Sr., and Imperial Oil of North Dakota have appealed from the judgment entered in an interpleader action brought by Russell L. Kiker, Jr. We reverse in part, affirm in part, and remand.
Kiker brought an interpleader action against Walters, Imperial, and others. The complaint alleged, among other things: (1) The parties are “owners in common of certain mineral interests and oil and gas properties”, the record title to which is in Kiker’s name; (2) Kiker collected income from the properties and distributed it to the parties pursuant to various oral…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TashireSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- F. C. Gaines, Jr. v. Sunray Oil Company, Amtel, Inc. v. E. Paul Wilkinson and J. Howard Marshall, as Individuals and as the Executive AssociatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
- Hospital Services, Inc. v. BrooksNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- Indianapolis Colts v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore, and Capital Improvement Board of Managers of Marion CountyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1984
- City of Fargo v. DawsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1991
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Piatz v. Austin Mutual Insurance Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 2002
- State v. KnudsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1993
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court of the State of North Dakota v. KaiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Disciplinary Action Against KaiserNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
- Disciplinary Board of the Supreme Court v. KorsmoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2006
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.