Legal Opinion

State v. Whitman

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided October 22, 2013No. 20120374PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*403MARING, Justice.

[¶ 1] Richard Whitman appeals the trial court’s judgment of conviction after a jury found him guilty of two counts of conspiracy to commit murder. Whitman argues the district court erred in allowing into evidence statements made to law enforcement in violation of Miranda v. Arizona, 384 U.S. 436, 86 S.Ct. 1602, 16 L.Ed.2d 694 (1966), and the evidence was insufficient to prove a conspiracy. Exercising our inherent authority to notice obvious error on our own motion, we reverse the criminal judgment holding the charge of conspiracy to commit murder under N.D.C.C. §§ 12.1-06-04…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  2. United States v. OlanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
  3. Davis v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. United States v. AtkinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
  5. Torres v. Oakland Scavenger Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1988

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. State v. O'ConnorNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  2. State v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. BoehmNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2014
  4. Yoney v. StateNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2021
  5. State v. ThomasNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2022

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API